Competition winning prototypes now in a pharmacy

Our partnership with Day Lewis has results! Our competition winning prototypes are under review in the Day Lewis pharmacy in Woodley, Reading. We are asking visitors to the pharmacy what they think and whether the displays have an impact on their views about AMR.

Beat Bad Bugs

Good bugs, bad bugs

A next step is to display these at the Day Lewis conference in November 2018 where attendees will get a chance to choose which one they would like to see in a pharmacy near them.

In Sheffield …

IDAPPS is on display at the Design4Health conference in Sheffield, 4–6 September 2018. ‘Towards the persuasive pharmacy’ shows the work of our 5 competition teams. We show the ideas that emerged from the teams of designers, architects, behavioural scientists, and pharmacists.

The IDAPPS team is also presenting a paper about the project: Design, architecture, pharmacy: making a difference to understanding anti-microbial resistance (AMR).

The paper introduces the working methods and outcomes of work to consider how we can use space within a pharmacy to encourage people to engage with information about AMR and self-care; and how we can design information so it is understood, whether on paper or in digital form. The research methods included review and analysis of archival material relevant to presenting information about drug-resistant infections; hierarchical task analysis; and co-design workshops with pharmacy workers and users.

Five great proposals: competition result announced

We are delighted with our competition outcomes. Each of our five teams proposed engaging and adaptable solutions, and we show some snapshots from their presentations here.

Congratulations to the teams behind Beat Bad Bugs and Good bugs | bad bugs  – who, after much discussion and deliberation, are our winners. Their proposals will be taken forward for installation in a Day Lewis pharmacy in Reading, for review and evaluation.

We look forward to showing and discussing all the proposals at exhibitions and conferences.

How can the work of the Vienna Circle help us today to understand antimicrobial resistance?

Miranda Mole, IDAPPS PDRA, writes:

Antimicrobial resistance threatens healthcare, many of the breakthroughs in healthcare are reliant on antibiotics – a valuable tool post-surgery. Some are suggesting that if antibiotics no longer work then not only will bacterial infections be much more serious, but the hospitals will have to stop routine surgical procedures. 

Threats can help us to be inventive. It is often suggested that during periods of war, the government spending will often more generally, foster innovation and economic growth. The American interest in science and technology, during WW2 had the benefit of later economic growth. indeed, ideation may be similar, individuals are thrown into groups or even countries with new and different ideas.

Otto Neurath – of Isotype renown – was connected with the members of the Vienna circle who  emphasised the value of evidence that was empirical or directly observed. Given the time period and cultural background within which Neurath was situated it is unsurprising that scientific knowledge and communication was heralded as a unifying force for society. That is not to say that he thought science or communication was not value laden, but he viewed it as without social or cultural prejudice. He wanted to express complex information in a way that was understandable to everyone developing a visual pictorial system as he was aware how important visuals are to our daily life, he understood that

Modern man receives a large part of his knowledge and general education by way of pictorial impressions, illustrations, photographs, films. Daily newspapers bring more pictures from year to year. In addition, the advertising business operates with optical signals as well as representations…’, so no surprise then that information about health was part of his preferred repertoire of visual communication.

Neurath’s work can inspire us to simplify information by making the message unambiguous, rather than by manipulating emotions, and trying to scare people into behaving in a certain way. He thought that information was potentially socially liberating.

How to connect with different messages? Another member of the Vienna circle had some interesting ideas that may contribute to this debate. Paul Lazarsfeld studied the way that US citizens decided to vote in presidential elections, suggesting that communication is more than providing people with information, it operates in a two-step model. Information is filtered through your primary circle of family, friends and acquaintances where the information is discussed and debated. Some members of this circle may be more influential, like ‘opinion leaders’ who receive the information and then discuss it and reinterpret it, others then construct and reinterpret the information, but it is the ‘opinion formers’ who influence individuals to change their opinions, attitudes and behaviours. Lazarsfeld thought opinion leaders had more influence on people’s opinions and behaviours than the media. The reasoning behind this was that opinion formers are trustworthy seen as giving opinion without any self-interest of personal gain, while the mass media can act as a reinforcing agent.

So, what has this to do with helping people understand the dangers of drug-resistant infection?

We can provide the information in a clear manner using infographics and also in a way that can stimulate or connect with the conversations and debates surrounding the issue. Our project competition provides an opportunity to enhance the interaction between information designers and architects, people who use pharmacies and not least, community pharmacists who have the potential to be useful opinion formers, and champions against the inappropriate use of antibiotics.

Congratulations to our teams

We have now selected 5 excellent teams to take part in the IDAPPS competition. We received varied and exciting Expressions of Interest in the IDAPPS competition, and are delighted to have attracted interest from a wide range of disciplines and experience.

Our successful teams:

  • Napper Architects have brought together a team comprising a clinician dealing with AMR on a daily basis, a mathematician who has research experience in developing analytical methods for AMR and an interactive design expert.
  • Spoonful of Sugar, Design Science and Erect Architecture have specific expertise in health psychology, applied design and improving public health through spatial design.
  • Public Health England Primary Care Unit, University of Leeds and Letter g bring experience in developing resources for primary health care staff including pharmacists, and in typographic and graphic design.
  • A team from the Universities of Nottingham and Birmingham combines biological science and science communication, built environment design with a focus on wellbeing, pharmacy and mindfulness and interaction design.
  • CCD apply the science of human factors and ergonomics to create user-centred design solutions. They believe that designing for people starts with understanding their behaviours & motivations.

Each of these teams will join us at a 2-day Ideas Lab on 30 April and 1 May 2018. Held at the University of Reading, this will include talks and presentations by members of the IDAPPS team to define the scope of the project. Colleagues from our pharmacy partner, Day Lewis, will be in attendance to talk specifically about the pharmacy that will host our competition winning entry. Pharmacy users will be invited to join us to collaborate in the design process, and the teams will develop their ideas in discussion with the project team, and with each other.

We are looking forward to a busy and stimulating Ideas Lab.  Congratulations to our teams!

Graphic representation

We are looking at examples of health communication from the past: printed ephemera, campaigns, films to find out how designers and others have used images and language to get their messages across. We are looking at, for example, different ways that sneezing and germs have been represented. Here are some examples:

Competition: Design for pharmacies, combating drug-resistant infection

One of the IDAPPS research outputs is a competition, and we’re asking small design practices, architects, information designers and pharmacists to help us.

On 16 February 2018, we launched the Call for Expressions of Interest to enter. We want to attract design teams that may include architects, information designers, behavioural scientists, and human factors / ergonomics specialists to bring ideas for an engaging, inspirational, didactic information space to raise awareness of the dangers of anti-microbial resistance in a community pharmacy.

Competition teams will begin designing in our Ideas Lab on 30 April/ 1 May 2018, where we will provide advice, inspiration and context.  Our pharmacy partner is Day Lewis and the winning design will be installed in a Day Lewis pharmacy for evaluation.

Get more information and how to enter a team:

AMR Pharmacy Project Call

AMR Pharmacy Entry Guidelines for Teams

AMR Pharmacy Ideas Lab Principles